Comparing laravel-mediable with laravel-medialibrary
Laravel-Mediable is a package to upload and handle all sorts of files (aka media) in a Laravel app. It was built by a Canadian based web agency called Plank.
With it you can do things like this:
$media = MediaUploader::fromSource($request->file('thumb')) ->toDestination('uploads', 'post/thumbnails') ->upload(); $post = Post::create($this->request->input()); $post->attachMedia($media, ['thumbnail']);
Pretty cool. You can read more on the way and how the package was built in an introductory post on the Plank blog.
At Spatie we've also built our own solution for handling media. In Plank's blogpost Sean lists these differences between their package and our Medialibrary.
|Relationship||many-to-one polymorphic, each media record is owned by one related model||many-to-many polymorphic, each media record can connect to any number of related models, and vice versa.|
|Filesystem||Files are stored in directories named after the media id relative to the disk root||Files can be stored anywhere on the disk|
|Association Identifier||Each media record belongs to one "collection"||Media can be attached to a model with any number of "tags"|
|Aggregate Types||Support for images and pdfs||Configurable support for any number of custom types|
|Miscellaneous Features||Glide manipulations||Synchronization commands|
Since our medialibary was introduced I've been asked from time to time why our medialibrary uses a many-to-one polymorphic relationship. The answer is: simplicity.
A previous iteration of our Blender CMS (a version that used Zend Framework 1 instead of Laravel ?) had a screen where the user could pick a file from all uploaded files (it looked much like this wordpress screen). We saw that, after having set up a lot of sites with Blender, that almost none of our clients used that screen...
In our projects we also see that our clients mostly need to attach an image, or a pdf or whatever, ... to only one model (for instance a news item). It rarely happens that a client wants to attach the same file to different models.
In our code we want to handle that use case as simple as possible and that's why we preferred using a many-to-one relation over a many-to-many relation. All the other differences listed in Plank's post are caused by the same reasoning, we preferred simplicity and ease of use over flexibility.
If you're looking for a good solution to handle media in a Laravel app I suggest you take a look at both our Medialibrary and Plank's Mediable package. Both packages are good at what they do. Pick the one that best fits your project (and just feels good to you).
What are your thoughts on "Comparing laravel-mediable with laravel-medialibrary"?